- Published amount or program scope
- $229,000–$458,000
- Historical term
- 48 months
- Support status
- Published project support
The equipment need
The company was in the midst of an expansion phase and was seeking to free up financial room for manoeuvre.
It had acquired equipment that had been in circulation for less than a year, tying up a significant part of its cash flow.
Two ways were envisaged: refinance existing leasingback, or directly fund new acquisitions.
The manager wanted to compare the two financing structures objectively before choosing.
- Production equipment acquired for less than one year
- New additional equipment
The support described in the project
We retained a sale-leaseback on property acquired for less than a year, the residual value of which remained high.
The transaction converted a fixed asset into immediately available cash.
The equipment remained in operation continuously: only legal ownership has changed.
A second part in leasing has been prepared to accompany the upcoming acquisitions of the growth phase.
The reported operational outcome
The company recovered substantial liquidity without assigning or displacing any equipment.
Funding for the expansion was secured without the use of a new bank line.
The structure now has a reproducible pattern for its next investments.
Applying the experience to a new project
Use this case to identify the equipment, timing and ownership questions relevant to your own investment. The historical scope and term are specific to the project described. For a new U.S. project, identify the contracting business, installation state, supplier quote and preferred use period; available structures require a separate assessment.
About this case study
Published September 19, 2026 by the Leaseworld editorial team. Identifying details are withheld. Historical budgets and requested terms do not establish eligibility or an offer for another applicant.
Amounts shown in U.S. dollars are rounded equivalents for comparison using a reference rate dated September 18, 2026. They are not current equipment prices or financing offers. The original project agreement determines its legal, tax and accounting treatment.
