- Published amount or program scope
- $115,000–$229,000
- Historical term
- 60 months
- Support status
- Published project support
The equipment need
The industrial company wanted to invest in a production machine tool, in this case a three-axis digitally controlled milling machine of manufacture.
This investment, amounting to between $115,000–$229,000excluding taxes, is a visit to internalize partly outsourced machining operations.
The machine was designed to increase the speed and reliability of the parts produced in series.
Capital financing would have mobilized a significant share of the available liquidity, at the expense of the need for working capital.
The company was therefore seeking financing covering the entire acquisition price, without any initial contribution.
- 3-axis digital control mill
The support described in the project
We have structured an equipment lease covering 100% of the machine's tax-free amount.
The dossier was presented to the most active institutions on the financing of machine tools, where the resale value of the asset is a solid guarantee.
The release of the funds was arranged directly with the manufacturer, according to his manufacturing and delivery schedule.
A low-value purchase option at the end of the contract was negotiated, so that the company would retain the machine at the end of the 60-month period.
The reported operational outcome
The workshop was equipped with no capital injections and no use of existing banking lines.
Lease payments are covered by the margin gain resulting from the internalisation of previously outsourced machining operations.
Production capacity was increased without depressing the need for working capital.
The company retains its leveraged liquidity to finance the growth of its orders.
Applying the experience to a new project
Use this case to identify the equipment, timing and ownership questions relevant to your own investment. The historical scope and term are specific to the project described. For a new U.S. project, identify the contracting business, installation state, supplier quote and preferred use period; available structures require a separate assessment.
About this case study
Published September 19, 2026 by the Leaseworld editorial team. Identifying details are withheld. Historical budgets and requested terms do not establish eligibility or an offer for another applicant.
Amounts shown in U.S. dollars are rounded equivalents for comparison using a reference rate dated September 18, 2026. They are not current equipment prices or financing offers. The original project agreement determines its legal, tax and accounting treatment.
