- Published amount or program scope
- $57,300–$115,000
- Historical term
- 60 months
- Support status
- Published project support
The equipment need
An industrial company wanted to increase its manufacturing capacity and productivity thanks to two new equipment.
The main project involved a 1500 mm retro-fitting bench, equipped with an automated and upgraded TIG welding station.
A second production equipment complemented the investment.
The manager wanted to finance the entire project without input, in order to preserve the company's liquidity.
The primary supplier requested a payment in four instalments, from the order to the receipt of the equipment.
The company wanted to compare two contract terms before entering into a contract.
- Retrofitted 1,500 mm joining machine
- TIG welding equipment
- Automation and equipment upgrades
- Additional production equipment
The support described in the project
We have structured an equipment lease covering 100% of the tax-free amount of both equipment.
We presented two detailed simulations, over 60 and 72 months, specifying for each of the first lease payments, monthly lease payments, final purchase option, fees and total financing cost.
We arranged the direct settlement of the furnaces by the financier, respecting the down payment arrangements provided for in the estimate.
The reported operational outcome
The company was able to commit its productive investment without using its liquidity.
Both facilities were funded under a single contract, which simplified administrative management.
Advance payments requested by the supplier were paid without advance from the company.
The manager has chosen his duration with full knowledge of the total cost of each option.
The workshop now has increased manufacturing capacity to meet its orders.
Applying the experience to a new project
Use this case to identify the equipment, timing and ownership questions relevant to your own investment. The historical scope and term are specific to the project described. For a new U.S. project, identify the contracting business, installation state, supplier quote and preferred use period; available structures require a separate assessment.
About this case study
Published September 19, 2026 by the Leaseworld editorial team. Identifying details are withheld. Historical budgets and requested terms do not establish eligibility or an offer for another applicant.
Amounts shown in U.S. dollars are rounded equivalents for comparison using a reference rate dated September 18, 2026. They are not current equipment prices or financing offers. The original project agreement determines its legal, tax and accounting treatment.
