- Published amount or program scope
- Under $57,300
- Historical term
- 24–48 months
- Support status
- Published project support
The equipment need
A web agency wanted to set up an equipment lease financing system for the websites it designs, mainly business websites.
A significant number of its clients requested payment facilities that it could not grant them.
Each refusal resulted in a project postponed, reduced in its perimeter, or lost to a low-end online solution.
The agency did not want to finance its clients itself or risk the risk of unpaid payments.
She had prepared a full presentation package and compared several organizations before committing.
- Websites windows
- Hosting and domain names
- Maintenance and management
- Graphic design services
The support described in the project
We have opened a leasing on the immaterial services produced by the agency.
The funded perimeter includes design, accommodation and maintenance, not just initial development.
Contracts are proposed for 24 to 48 months depending on the size of the project.
The agency is paid in full upon delivery of the site, the credit risk being borne by the financier.
A dedicated commercial contact accompanies the agency on the financing structure of its first files.
The reported operational outcome
The agency presents monthly payments in each of its commercial proposals, alongside the overall price.
Its customers access a custom-designed site without initial disbursement.
Projects funded are more comprehensive than those settled on cash, including maintenance.
The agency cashes on delivery, which stabilizes its liquidity and removes the follow-up of the relacs.
The maintenance integrated into the contract establishes a lasting relationship with each customer instead of a one-time sale.
Applying the experience to a new project
Use this case to identify the equipment, timing and ownership questions relevant to your own investment. The historical scope and term are specific to the project described. For a new U.S. project, identify the contracting business, installation state, supplier quote and preferred use period; available structures require a separate assessment.
About this case study
Published September 19, 2026 by the Leaseworld editorial team. Identifying details are withheld. Historical budgets and requested terms do not establish eligibility or an offer for another applicant.
Amounts shown in U.S. dollars are rounded equivalents for comparison using a reference rate dated September 18, 2026. They are not current equipment prices or financing offers. The original project agreement determines its legal, tax and accounting treatment.
